Liverpool · Memory · Sound · Public History

INJUSTICES 1946

History did not end in 1946.

INJUSTICES 1946 is a Liverpool-born cultural research and storytelling project exploring how historical injustice survives in lives, families and public memory.

Our work begins with the forced repatriation of Liverpool’s Chinese merchant seamen and the generations that followed, while building a framework for other overlooked histories of racism, displacement, institutional injustice and community struggles for recognition.

INJUSTICES 1946 emblem with a Liver Bird at the centre of a balance between forms referencing Britain and China.
Place
Liverpool is where we began.
History
1946 is our point of departure.
Method
Listening is our method.
Purpose
Overlooked stories deserve public memory.

01 · Before 1946

A community before the injustice.

Liverpool’s Chinese presence did not begin with deportation. Before 1946, seamen, workers, businesses and families were already part of the social life of the city.

Historic black-and-white street view of Liverpool Chinatown in 1933.
Liverpool Chinatown, 1933.
Historic photograph of the Low Soon shop in Liverpool Chinatown.
A Chinese business in Liverpool’s historic Chinatown.
1946

The injustice

Chinese merchant seamen in Liverpool were removed from Britain through a government repatriation operation, separating families and leaving many partners and children with little or no explanation.

Families left behind

Many Chinese seamen had formed relationships and families with local white British women. Some of these women faced hostility or rejection from their own relatives and communities because of their relationships with Chinese men. After the removals, many were left raising children alone while believing they had been deserted.

The seamen are the historical foundation of this project, but our inquiry does not stop at the moment of removal. We ask what disappearance meant inside a family, what children were told, what later generations inherited, and why some answers took decades to reach them.

The men are where the history begins. The generations that followed are where its consequences continue.

A wider history

From a wartime workforce to a decades-long search for truth.

The surviving record is incomplete and published figures vary. This timeline brings together the most consistently documented stages of the story.

  1. A port community takes root

    Shipping routes between Liverpool and Chinese ports brought seamen to the city. Boarding houses, shops, associations and families became part of the life of Liverpool’s historic Chinatown.

  2. Essential and unequal wartime labour

    Thousands of Chinese seamen served through Liverpool during the Second World War, keeping Britain supplied while facing dangerous work and lower pay than many British crewmates.

  3. The struggle for equal pay

    The Liverpool Chinese Seamen’s Union organised a strike over wage inequality and the war-risk bonus. The men won improvements, but official and commercial records increasingly cast organised seamen as troublesome.

  4. A secret decision

    A Whitehall meeting led to Home Office file HO 213/926, titled “Compulsory repatriation of undesirable Chinese seamen”. The policy was not publicly debated and families were not informed.

  5. Round-ups and removals

    Police, immigration officers and shipping companies helped remove men from Liverpool and place them on departing ships. Some left voluntarily, but evidence records raids, detention and forced removal. Wives and children were denied a chance to say goodbye.

  6. The harm continued at home

    Women were left to support families alone. Children grew up amid poverty, racism, disrupted cultural inheritance and the belief that their fathers had deserted them. Some entered children’s homes, and many learned the truth only late in life.

  7. Descendants recover the story

    Documentaries, declassified records and descendant-led research brought the operation back into public view. A memorial plaque was installed in 2006, but families continue to seek missing answers, fuller recognition and an official apology.

02 · After 1946

The descendants are not an epilogue.

The consequences of 1946 continued through paternal absence, inherited misinformation, racism, interrupted cultural inheritance and unresolved questions of identity and belonging.

01

Children

Lives shaped by absent fathers and explanations that were often incomplete or unavailable.

02

Memory

Private family knowledge surviving beside, outside or in tension with official records.

03

Inheritance

Identity, belonging and the emotional labour of making sense of a history discovered late.

04

Recognition

The continuing work of asking what happened, who knew, and what public acknowledgement should mean.

An exhibition case containing dolls, rings, documents and family photographs. View photograph ↗

Family photographs & objects

The everyday things that hold a history.

Dolls, rings and family photographs are brought together in an exhibition display about families searching for answers. Alongside testimony, such objects invite us to consider the intimate lives behind a public history of separation.

Exhibition photograph supplied by Joe Phillips (Sze). The objects are shown in their exhibition setting.

Your family, your words

Share your story.

Are you a family member, child, grandchild or descendant of a Chinese merchant seaman affected by the 1946 Liverpool repatriations? We welcome your memories, questions and family stories. You do not need a complete account to get in touch.

Your submission is private. Stories are not automatically published.

Share only what you feel comfortable sharing. Please avoid other people’s private contact details or sensitive information without their permission. You can leave publication permissions unticked and still submit your story privately.

How we handle your submission

Fields marked * are required. All permission boxes start unticked.

Write in the language you prefer. You can start with a memory, a name or something you would like to understand. Maximum 20,000 characters.

Your choices about your story

Receiving your story is separate from permission to use it. The project may use your story only for the purposes you actively select below. The team must review these choices before any use; nothing is published automatically.

Your email and phone number are never part of permission to publish. Even without your name, details in a story may identify you or someone else.

To change your choices or request deletion, email contact@injustices1946.com. You can withdraw permission for future use; copies already shared by others may not be recoverable.

03 · Featured work

The first featured sound work from INJUSTICES 1946

What the Sea Refused to Tell

Practice-based immersive sound work · 2026 · Binaural excerpt

A testimony-led spatial sound work by Kristina Chen, developed from first-person accounts by Yvonne Foley and Joe Phillips (Sze), environmental recordings, archival traces and experimental composition.

Rather than reconstructing the deportations through fictional historical sound, the work begins with what remains: testimony, partial memory, recordings of place and recurring sonic fragments. It asks how absence, cultural distance and incomplete knowledge can be encountered through listening without turning trauma into spectacle.

This excerpt moves through the descendants’ discovery of what happened to their fathers and into questions of cultural inheritance, wartime service, the prejudice faced by women and mothers left behind, and unresolved identity. Recurring sea shanties create a maritime thread through the testimony, while Morse code returns as an unanswered intergenerational question.

Testimony Spatial audio Sea shanties Intergenerational memory

Listen to the excerpt

Headphones recommended for the binaural spatial image.
What the Sea Refused to Tell Binaural excerpt · 8:37
0:008:37

Selected from 10:40 to the end of the full composition, where testimony, maritime song and recurring Morse code converge.

Enquire about the full work Open audio file ↗

04 · Research approach

Listening as method.

Listening is not simply how our work is consumed. It is part of how we research, edit and decide what not to claim.

01

Oral testimony

Descendants and community members are approached as holders of knowledge and interpretation, not as material to be fitted into a pre-written narrative.

02

Critical archive

Documents establish context, but are read alongside family memory, contradiction and what official records leave unsaid.

03

Spatial sound

Proximity, distance, recession and movement become compositional ways of thinking about cultural distance, place and unstable memory.

04

Ethical restraint

The work refuses to fabricate the lost sound of the deportations. Sound supports testimony without pretending to recover an irrecoverable past.

Gaps, silences and incomplete records are not problems to disguise. They are part of the historical condition. Our practice asks how to make those absences perceptible without filling them with invented certainty.

05 · Memory in public

What remains. What is remembered.

Memorial plaque for the Chinese seamen who were forcibly deported from Liverpool in 1946.
“Wherever you are, you will be in our hearts.”

The memorial plaque gives the history a place in Liverpool’s public landscape. Its inscription also speaks to something the archive cannot contain: the private endurance of absence within families.

For INJUSTICES 1946, commemoration is not a closing gesture. It is a point from which living memory, testimony and the continuing search for recognition can be heard.

Around the memorial

A place to meet, remember and speak.

The plaque is part of a living social landscape. These photographs bring the people and conversations around it into view.

Two people talking beside the blue memorial plaque in Liverpool. View photograph ↗
In conversation

A conversation beside the plaque remembering the Chinese seamen forcibly deported from Liverpool in 1946.

People gathered on the pavement near the memorial plaque. View photograph ↗
Coming together

People gathered near the memorial. Remembering also happens through meeting, talking and spending time together.

Community members gathered beneath the memorial plaque in Liverpool. View photograph ↗
A shared act of remembrance

Community members gathered beneath the memorial plaque. Public memory is carried by living people.

New community photographs supplied by Joe Phillips (Sze). They document gatherings around the memorial, not events attributed to INJUSTICES 1946.

06 · Archive

A growing archive, not a closed collection.

Historical records sit beside oral testimony, family material, photographs, objects and place-based memory. The archive grows as relationships and research develop.

Documents

Government records, contextual research and historical traces.

Oral histories

First-person accounts and intergenerational family narratives.

Family & place

Photographs, locations, objects and memories that carry histories outside official files.

Public engagement

Talks, community events and cultural work that bring these histories into public conversation.

Documents, lists, photographs and small objects arranged in a glass exhibition case. View photograph ↗
Reading the traces together

Documents, photographs and objects displayed side by side. A photographed exhibition case offers a view of how different kinds of evidence can be brought into conversation.

Community collections

Lives beyond the official record.

Family albums, learning materials and everyday objects also speak to the wider life of Liverpool’s Chinese community. These exhibition photographs provide context, rather than identifying every item with the 1946 removals.

An open album of family photographs displayed in a glass case. View photograph ↗
A family in photographs

An open family album on display. Portraits and photographs of everyday occasions offer another way into the history of a community.

Chinese-language textbooks, writing brushes and photographs of classes in an exhibition case. View photograph ↗
Language, learning and continuity

Textbooks, brushes and photographs of classes place education and cultural life within the wider story of Liverpool’s Chinese community.

Exhibition photographs supplied by Joe Phillips (Sze). They show existing displays, not collections held by INJUSTICES 1946. Original exhibit labels and credits remain visible in the enlarged photographs.

View the community heritage talk poster ↗

07 · Read, listen, watch

Encounter the history in different forms.

No single article, programme or archive can contain this history. These selected resources offer journalism, audio, drama, documentary, family research and community perspectives.

Community interview scenes

Making space for a story to be heard.

These interview photographs, shared by Joe Phillips, offer a glimpse of the conversations through which experiences are recorded. Explore the independent reporting, audio and documentary below.

A woman speaking with an interviewer while a camera operator records the conversation. View photograph ↗
A recorded conversation

A participant and interviewer in conversation, with a camera operator recording the exchange.

A seated man in conversation with an interviewer and a camera operator. View photograph ↗
Time to listen

Another interview scene from the photographs shared with the project. Listening begins with time and attention to the person speaking.

Photographs supplied by Joe Phillips (Sze). These community interview records are not presented as INJUSTICES 1946 productions or as images from a particular programme listed below.

New perspectives

Four routes into the story.

A family search, a photographic exhibition, a documentary and a Chinese-language account open the history through different forms and viewpoints.

Family historyBBC News · 2015

Looking for my Shanghai father

Yvonne Foley’s search moves from a childhood revelation to archives in Britain, Australia and China, revealing why her father disappeared and how families began recovering the history.

Read BBC feature ↗
ExhibitionIndependent review · 2014

Ebb and Flow: Liverpool’s Chinatown in photographs

A review of Open Eye Gallery’s exhibition, connecting Bert Hardy’s 1942 seamen portraits, Martin Parr’s 1985 Chinatown photographs and community oral histories.

Explore exhibition review ↗
DocumentaryCNA Insider · 2023

My Stolen Chinese Father

Part one of The Exiles follows children of Chinese seamen forced out of Britain after the war, placing family testimony alongside the institutional decisions that separated them.

Watch documentary ↗
Simplified Chinese reportGlobal Times · 2021

From wartime service to secret expulsion

A Chinese-language overview of the seamen’s wartime contribution, unequal treatment, the secret postwar removals and the long wait for recognition.

Read Chinese report ↗

Selected collection

Reporting, audio, archives and family research.

Nine further resources bring together journalism, drama, podcasts, documentary work, photography and descendant-led research.

ReadThe Guardian · 2021

The secret deportations

A detailed long read tracing the wartime contribution of Chinese seamen, the secret Whitehall decision, the removals and the descendants’ search for truth.

Open article ↗
ListenThe Guardian · 2021

A British betrayal

Yvonne Foley speaks about discovering her Chinese heritage and searching for the father she never knew in this episode of Today in Focus.

Open podcast ↗
Audio dramaBBC Radio 4 · 2024

Dragons of the Pool

A drama inspired by the forced repatriations, moving between a family’s wartime life in Liverpool and a daughter’s later attempt to understand her father’s disappearance.

Open BBC programme ↗
ViewThe Guardian · 2024

Bert Hardy’s Liverpool portraits

A photograph-led account of Chinese seamen in 1942 Liverpool, their equal-pay strike and the later campaign led by descendants including Yvonne Foley.

Open photo story ↗
NewsCGTN Europe · 2025

Memory carried into the present

Coverage of a Liverpool flower-laying ceremony at the memorial plaque shows how families and community members continue to remember the seamen publicly.

Open news story ↗
ExploreDragons and Lions

A descendant-led archive

Research, documents and family stories assembled by Yvonne Foley and the community of descendants who worked to recover what happened.

Open archive ↗
ExploreThe Mixed Museum

Anglo-Chinese families in context

An accessible exhibition placing the 1946 deportations within the wider history of mixed families, wartime Britain and the children left behind.

Open exhibition ↗
PodcastBBC World Service · 2020

The scandal of Liverpool’s missing Chinese sailors

Witness History speaks with Yvonne Foley about the Chinese merchant seamen who served Britain during the Second World War and were then forced to leave Liverpool after the war.

Open BBC podcast ↗

08 · People

Research is relational.

INJUSTICES 1946 brings together sound practice, anthropological research, family knowledge, community connection and cultural storytelling.

Black-and-white portrait of Kristina Chen (Qianbei Chen).

Executive Producer · Sound Designer & Researcher

Kristina Chen (Qianbei Chen / 陳芊貝)

Kristina Chen is a sound designer and researcher working across oral history, documentary practice, spatial audio and sonic anthropology. Her work is interested in overlooked histories and in how listening can create encounters with memory that conventional narration cannot.

Her current research centres Liverpool’s Chinese community and the intergenerational consequences of the 1946 repatriations. She trained in Recording Arts before completing postgraduate study in Anthropology at UCL, where this project’s first immersive sound work was developed.

Portrait of Joe Phillips (Sze).

Business Executive

Joe Phillips (Sze) 喬・菲利普斯(施)

Son of a Chinese merchant seaman forcibly repatriated from Liverpool.

Joe’s connection to INJUSTICES 1946 is both personal and collaborative. For decades he believed that his father had voluntarily abandoned the family; learning that his father had been forcibly removed transformed how he understood his own family history and Chinese heritage.

His testimony forms part of What the Sea Refused to Tell. Within INJUSTICES 1946, Joe also brings family knowledge, community relationships, public engagement and business experience to the project’s long-term development.

INJUSTICES 1946 emblem.

09 · Our symbol

Born in Liverpool. Built around memory, movement and justice.

The Liver Bird does more than locate the project in Liverpool. In our emblem it connects the city to its maritime history — to movement between sea and city, departure and home, migration and belonging.

Placed at the centre of the balance, the bird also becomes a witness and a fulcrum. Liverpool is not simply the backdrop to these histories; it is the place from which they are held, remembered and reconsidered.

The two suspended forms recall the British and Chinese family histories from which our first investigation emerged. They are not intended to weigh one nation against another. The balance represents the distance between official record and lived memory, between histories publicly recorded and experiences carried privately across generations.

PlaceA project rooted in Liverpool.
MovementSea, migration, departure and belonging.
WitnessA city holding histories that were not always publicly heard.
BalanceRestoring weight to lived experience without simplifying history into two sides.

1946 marks where INJUSTICES began, not where its stories must end.

10 · Beyond one event

1946 is our point of departure, not our boundary.

INJUSTICES 1946 began with one history in Liverpool, but the questions it raises extend beyond a single community: who is heard, who is believed, what institutions record, what families carry, and how recognition is won.

Future work will explore overlooked experiences of racism, migration, displacement, labour, family separation, institutional injustice and community struggles for truth across Britain. Potential strands may include racialised migration histories such as Windrush and other community-led campaigns for recognition, while each history will be researched on its own terms.

The 1946 repatriations remain our founding story and central body of work. They also establish the approach that guides what comes next: begin locally, listen closely, research carefully, and bring lived experience into public conversation.

Racism & belonging Migration & displacement Institutional injustice Family memory Community justice Public recognition

11 · Our mission

To remember what was overlooked, and make space for what must still be heard.

INJUSTICES 1946 uses research, testimony, sound and cultural storytelling to bring overlooked histories of injustice into public memory. We challenge racism, inequality and exclusion by creating accessible ways for communities and audiences to encounter histories whose consequences continue into the present.

01

Recognition

Restore attention to histories and experiences that have been omitted, distorted or left at the margins of public memory.

02

Equality

Oppose racism and discrimination in all forms, while recognising the specific histories and structures through which inequality is produced.

03

Listening

Begin with lived experience, family memory and community knowledge rather than treating people as illustrations of a pre-written story.

04

Accountability

Research carefully, acknowledge uncertainty and remain responsible to contributors as stories move into public circulation.

12 · Community support

Supporting our next chapter.

Podcast venue support

The Black-E

The Black-E is an arts and community centre in Liverpool, connecting artists and communities through participation, creativity and cultural exchange.

We are grateful to The Black-E for offering space to support the development of our forthcoming podcast. Beginning with the children and families of the Chinese seamen forcibly repatriated from Liverpool, the podcast will explore personal testimony and wider questions of racism, belonging and equality.

Explore The Black-E ↗

13 · Contact

Stories, collaboration or partnership?

We welcome contact from descendants, community members, researchers, cultural organisations, commissioners, potential partners and funders.

Stories & archives Research Commissioning Partnerships Sponsorship & funding
For a family story and its permission choices, please use Share your story.

Open this message in your email app ↗ This opens an email draft. You still need to send it from your email app, or write directly to contact@injustices1946.com.
Your submission and privacy

This form sends your details, story and permission choices to the INJUSTICES 1946 team through Netlify Forms. Submissions are accessed through the project’s private Netlify account and are not added to this public website. Access should be limited to people handling contributions. The form records the consent wording version and your selected language alongside your choices. We do not store your story in browser storage. If you leave the page before submitting, your text may be lost. For questions about access, correction, deletion or permissions, contact contact@injustices1946.com.

To change your choices or request deletion, email contact@injustices1946.com. You can withdraw permission for future use; copies already shared by others may not be recoverable.

Netlify privacy policy ↗

INJUSTICES 1946

Share this website

Help this history reach other families. Share the INJUSTICES 1946 website with someone you know.

Share this website

Help this history reach other families. Share the INJUSTICES 1946 website with someone you know.

Only the website link is shared. Your form entries are never included.

Photographs & community memory

Open full-size photograph ↗